International responses / Comment
Conflict prevention and the european response to states in crisis
01/03/2007 By Ivan Briscoe
Western governments have expressed their preference for prevention over post-conflict resolution and reconstruction for over a decade, citing the humanitarian cost of intrastate war (whose victims are primarily civilians), the relaxation of nation-states’ sovereignty entitlements, and the supreme cost-effectiveness of nipping armed conflict in the bud (amply manifested by the EU’s diplomatic failures in the Balkans).
But close examination of the EU’s record on conflict prevention suggests it has yet to achieve any sort of broad institutional acceptance within the bloc for its policies, while its participation in “deep”, transformational peace-building is being profoundly affected by the global security concerns connected with “state failure”.
Download the full version of this publication, available in English (57 kB)
Spanish (69 kB)
Keywords
Conflict prevention Congo EU Foreign Policy European Union Fragile state Haiti Latin America & Caribbean Sub-Saharan Africa TerrorismRelated publications
- Recovering from armed conflict: lessons learned and next steps for improved international assistance
Bio author: Ivan Briscoe
Ivan Briscoe studied philosophy, politics and economics (PPE) at the University of Oxford, before receiving a Frank Knox Memorial Fellowship to continue his studies for a year at Harvard University. He has also completed a master's degree in Development at Madrid's Complutense University. From 2004 he has worked as the editor of the English edition of El País (Madrid). He writes often on Latin America and developing world issues for Open Democracy (www.opendemocracy.net) and The New Internationalist, and has taken part in numerous radio programmes on the BBC, Radio Nederland and Radio France International.


